With our Congressional Democrats writhing about trying to find the votes to pass the latest version of so-called "Health Care Reform", I've been doing a lot of thinking about rights, obligations, and freedom.
Here's the thing: everyone having health care sounds good. Yeah. I mean, all things being equal, who doesn't think that's a good idea? And there may yet be a smart way to get there, but all the bills waved at us by the Dems so far aren't the way. Why not, you ask?
Ok, let's say that we agree that all citizens have the right to health care (I do not necessarily agree, but for the sake of discussion, I'll concede the point). Now, we have created a right, all shiny and new. But now there's a problem, some of us can't afford it. So we have to help them pay for it, because despite what you may have heard, it ain't free. Who's gonna pay for it? Why the government, or course.
But hang on..where does the government get their money? Well, they can borrow it or they can take it. Borrowing it means they took out a loan in your name (as a taxpayer) without your permission or signature, and you are partially responsible for paying it back. Or they can just raise your taxes, tax the health care plan that you worked hard for, or just take it out of your check...also without your permission by the way. Do you have a right to your money? Is your right to the money you earned more important than your neighbors right to health care they didn't work for?
Secondly, let's look at this notion of health care as a right. The government cannot create a new right, regardless of what they tell you. Rights are inherent in man from birth, you have them simply because you are alive...endowed by your Creator, you might say. Our Declaration of Independence says:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..."
Ok then, so rights come from God (or whomever you chose to call him). Did God give us the right to health care? And then if we already have rights, what is the government for? Most people don't read the next sentence in the Declaration, or they'd know:
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,..."
Did you catch that? To secure these rights. Governments are supposed to protect our liberties, not create or enforce them, or even make us pay for them. And the consent of the governed is required...if you don't want government help, the Declaration of Independence says that's your choice, not Nancy Pelosi's. Read the rest of the document if you want to know what happens to governments that rule without the consent of the governed.
Rather that create a right that doesn't exist, or fund this new right by unconstitutional taxation, why not work to fix the problems that exist in health care now? Stop listening to the special interests groups and lobbyists, and start listening to doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals, and their patients. Find out why people can't get or keep health insurance, and remove the roadblocks where we can. Find out what makes health care so unnecessarily expensive (like baseless lawsuits) and let's work to streamline the process without adversely affecting cost or quality.
Why won't they? Because then they can't claim to have given us a new right, and claim victory. And because it makes too much dang sense.
Nolanbuck
Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts
Friday, November 6, 2009
Monday, September 21, 2009
It's a Tax!
Yes, boys & girls, if the government takes your money without your permission...even if it's "for your own good"... it's a tax.
Nolanbuck
Nolanbuck
Friday, July 17, 2009
Bad Medicine
originally posted at: 2BucksWorth.com
Nolanbuck's note: I have worked in health care for nigh on 20 years, and while I am no expert, I do know a thiing or two about how the system works, from both sides of the reception desk. This blog on the current health care debate is long overdue. My apologies to those who I told I would be addressing this issue earlier for failing to do so. But better late than never.
That is....unless of course you are President Obama or the Democratic congressional leadership, is which case later is always a bad idea when right the heck now is so much better. Later would cause so many nasty side effects, like congresspersons actually reading the bill they are voting on, or the "3 days of sunshine" that Mr. Obama promised (but has yet to deliver even once) for every bill before the Congress.
And now again they are in an all-fired hurry to pass a health care reform bill. I guess a bad idea is better if you don't stop to think about it. For crying out loud, even Lyndon Johnson took over a year to pass the legislative kidney stone that became Medicare. Why the big rush?
Why, of course, is because the previous big spending bills and an "apologize-first" foreign policy have this President and his pals in Congress staring at some sliding poll numbers, so better to ram all of the pet projects through before the American people wake up completely from their coma. And now even the so-called "conservative Democrats" in Congress have grown a spine and have started telling Speaker Pelosi that they will lose their job if they keep being led around by the nose toward a big government agenda.
But why not have health care reform, if we can just slow down abit and actually talk about it? Well, it depends on the kind of "reform" you are interested in. Does health care in America need some work? Absolutely it does. Don't I want everyone to have decent health care? Of course I do.
But the bill currently before the Congress does the wrong thing in the wrong way. Government health care coverage plans like Medicare and Medicaid already make health care cost more for everyone by demanding care that patients don't need (like a three day minimum hospital stay before a patient can be moved to an outpatient rehabilitation center) and then setting their own price regardless of the cost of the care they insist upon. And who makes up the difference in the cost? Those of us who have private health insurance or pay out of pocket.
Ask yourself: why can practically everyone afford car insurance (which is required by law) and home insurance (required by the mortgage company) but we can't afford our own health insurance without help from our employer, the government, etc? Because the government is already knee-deep in the health care system, and they are the ones driving up costs. I'm no fan of the insurance or drug companies, but it makes me want to laugh when people blame the corruption of the big evil corporations for the problems in health care, when our own government's health care appendages are rife with corruption, graft, and incompetence, all of which make health care more expensive and less available for all of us.
If this bill passes, you will be required by law to have health insurance. Don't want it? Tough. you will be allowed to keep your current employer plan if you have one. But if you resign or are fired, you will be forced into the government plan. The plan would also hurt those of us who already have insurance by either taxing our previously un-taxable health benefits, or providing a cheaper-per-employee government subsidized plan that would force many companies to abandon their own plan to save the company money. So much for keeping your own plan if you like it, huh?
This bill could also hurt those who currently do not have insurance through their employer, by forcing companies to extend benefits or pay a fine. Either cost will force employer to reduce work force size to compensate for the cost of the new legislation. So some Americans who now have a job but no insurance will soon have insurance but no job. Awesome idea. (Not)
The bottom line is this, health care in America needs some help. It needs to be streamlined, cleaned up of corruption and waste, made safer by increased infection control, and yes, made available to everyone. The question is, do we need the government to spend $1 trillion of our money to fix it? Or do we need to have experts from every discipline of health care and business come together to make a better plan? A plan that includes co-ops for the uninsured to buy insurance at lower group rates, limits on federal manipulation of heath care funding and maybe even an insurance for your health insurance, a few extra dollars a week to make sure you have coverage to bridge the gap if you are out of work or hurt.
What we do not need is a government-run health care system, at a time when countries like Canada and Australia that have socialized medicine are backing away in favor of more private care. We do not need just sit by and trust our very well-being to the government that gave us Social Security (bankrupt), Medicare (bankrupt) and welfare, or to the President and Congress that rushed through a stimulus bill so far has only allowed unemployment to rise higher (9.5%) than they said it would go without the stimulus (8%).
It is time to say no....time to say ENOUGH. Stop spending our children's money and our national prosperity on your own Voltairian social welfare-state dreams and start doing your jobs...which is looking out for the best interests of the people who hired you. The country needs some fixing, but it needs a tune up, not a new paint job and tinted windows. Call your congressperson, call the White House, tell them to slow down and stop trying to pull the wool over our eyes, act like adults and maybe they can do us some good for a change.
Nolanbuck
Nolanbuck's note: I have worked in health care for nigh on 20 years, and while I am no expert, I do know a thiing or two about how the system works, from both sides of the reception desk. This blog on the current health care debate is long overdue. My apologies to those who I told I would be addressing this issue earlier for failing to do so. But better late than never.
That is....unless of course you are President Obama or the Democratic congressional leadership, is which case later is always a bad idea when right the heck now is so much better. Later would cause so many nasty side effects, like congresspersons actually reading the bill they are voting on, or the "3 days of sunshine" that Mr. Obama promised (but has yet to deliver even once) for every bill before the Congress.
And now again they are in an all-fired hurry to pass a health care reform bill. I guess a bad idea is better if you don't stop to think about it. For crying out loud, even Lyndon Johnson took over a year to pass the legislative kidney stone that became Medicare. Why the big rush?
Why, of course, is because the previous big spending bills and an "apologize-first" foreign policy have this President and his pals in Congress staring at some sliding poll numbers, so better to ram all of the pet projects through before the American people wake up completely from their coma. And now even the so-called "conservative Democrats" in Congress have grown a spine and have started telling Speaker Pelosi that they will lose their job if they keep being led around by the nose toward a big government agenda.
But why not have health care reform, if we can just slow down abit and actually talk about it? Well, it depends on the kind of "reform" you are interested in. Does health care in America need some work? Absolutely it does. Don't I want everyone to have decent health care? Of course I do.
But the bill currently before the Congress does the wrong thing in the wrong way. Government health care coverage plans like Medicare and Medicaid already make health care cost more for everyone by demanding care that patients don't need (like a three day minimum hospital stay before a patient can be moved to an outpatient rehabilitation center) and then setting their own price regardless of the cost of the care they insist upon. And who makes up the difference in the cost? Those of us who have private health insurance or pay out of pocket.
Ask yourself: why can practically everyone afford car insurance (which is required by law) and home insurance (required by the mortgage company) but we can't afford our own health insurance without help from our employer, the government, etc? Because the government is already knee-deep in the health care system, and they are the ones driving up costs. I'm no fan of the insurance or drug companies, but it makes me want to laugh when people blame the corruption of the big evil corporations for the problems in health care, when our own government's health care appendages are rife with corruption, graft, and incompetence, all of which make health care more expensive and less available for all of us.
If this bill passes, you will be required by law to have health insurance. Don't want it? Tough. you will be allowed to keep your current employer plan if you have one. But if you resign or are fired, you will be forced into the government plan. The plan would also hurt those of us who already have insurance by either taxing our previously un-taxable health benefits, or providing a cheaper-per-employee government subsidized plan that would force many companies to abandon their own plan to save the company money. So much for keeping your own plan if you like it, huh?
This bill could also hurt those who currently do not have insurance through their employer, by forcing companies to extend benefits or pay a fine. Either cost will force employer to reduce work force size to compensate for the cost of the new legislation. So some Americans who now have a job but no insurance will soon have insurance but no job. Awesome idea. (Not)
The bottom line is this, health care in America needs some help. It needs to be streamlined, cleaned up of corruption and waste, made safer by increased infection control, and yes, made available to everyone. The question is, do we need the government to spend $1 trillion of our money to fix it? Or do we need to have experts from every discipline of health care and business come together to make a better plan? A plan that includes co-ops for the uninsured to buy insurance at lower group rates, limits on federal manipulation of heath care funding and maybe even an insurance for your health insurance, a few extra dollars a week to make sure you have coverage to bridge the gap if you are out of work or hurt.
What we do not need is a government-run health care system, at a time when countries like Canada and Australia that have socialized medicine are backing away in favor of more private care. We do not need just sit by and trust our very well-being to the government that gave us Social Security (bankrupt), Medicare (bankrupt) and welfare, or to the President and Congress that rushed through a stimulus bill so far has only allowed unemployment to rise higher (9.5%) than they said it would go without the stimulus (8%).
It is time to say no....time to say ENOUGH. Stop spending our children's money and our national prosperity on your own Voltairian social welfare-state dreams and start doing your jobs...which is looking out for the best interests of the people who hired you. The country needs some fixing, but it needs a tune up, not a new paint job and tinted windows. Call your congressperson, call the White House, tell them to slow down and stop trying to pull the wool over our eyes, act like adults and maybe they can do us some good for a change.
Nolanbuck
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
